Configure
Turn on and organize native capability that already supports the outcome.
Inventory first
Repair the workflow
Define the trigger, owner, required information, decision, handoff, exception and completed outcome. Then decide which existing system should own each step.
Turn on and organize native capability that already supports the outcome.
Use one approved form, procedure or data definition instead of parallel workarounds.
Add a supported integration only where a manual transfer creates real friction.
Give people current instructions and ownership so the improved workflow is actually used.
Buy only for a gap
A new tool should solve an essential capability gap that current systems cannot responsibly support. Include migration, training, implementation, usage and ongoing administration in the complete cost.
Practical answers
Often, yes. Native features, clearer ownership and one supported connection may solve the problem without another platform.
When an essential capability is genuinely absent, the full cost is understood, the workflow has an owner and success can be measured.
Current products and plans, native workflow features, APIs, forms, permissions, data ownership, workarounds and overlapping licenses.
Existing-tool first
Map the workflow and verify native capabilities before deciding whether a new tool is justified.